You are in for a surprise, most fields have the exact same kind of people in academia.
Computer science is probably the worst as it is actually close to mathematics.
Mathematics too is the same, when you break some of the more recent papers down, you will notice most of it looks like some kind of cover up for what could be explained in few simple sentences.
I wish there was a rule in publishing to including a section called "explained like you are 5"
I notice a pattern, good papers have very little mathiness to them. The more research paper mill'ey they get, the more mathier they become.
Computer science is probably the worst as it is actually close to mathematics.
Mathematics too is the same, when you break some of the more recent papers down, you will notice most of it looks like some kind of cover up for what could be explained in few simple sentences.
I wish there was a rule in publishing to including a section called "explained like you are 5"
I notice a pattern, good papers have very little mathiness to them. The more research paper mill'ey they get, the more mathier they become.