Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't think the personal responsibility of someone with a developing mind is any match for 10-20 years of extensive AB testing.



Well... no, but neither is it a match for, say, thousands of years of drug abuse. And yet...

Perhaps our parents have something to do with that?


When I was a kid, all drugs were illegal, at least to me as a minor. My parents had the alcohol is bad and cigarettes are bad talks with me but even if I wanted to drink and smoke, it was hard to access until I got closer to the age where it was allowed anyway.


When I was a kid, all drugs were illegal to me too. Yet my parents had cigarettes, coffee, alcohol, and weed in the house. Me and my siblings didn't touch them.

That has something to do with the law?


Likely not the law of the government, but I'm certain the law of your parents had something to do with it.


That's, uh, sort of my point here :)


Kids will mostly do what they see others do. This makes drugs less difficult to dissuade. It makes phones and screens particularly pernicious. "do as I say, not as I do" is not always good enough.

I have kids. They watch movies with us, and the nanny gives them more screen time than I'd like. I don't have to talk to them about drugs because nobody is handing my kids drugs. But screens are everywhere and I use them all the time, sadly.


And yet...we don't recommend parents allowing their middle school children to try addictive drugs.


More like 10mn-20mn subjective years of AB testing (horizontally across the population/user pool)




Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: