you're a privacy by-default kinda guy because you don't maintain any 'traditional' 'social media' accounts i guess you mean to say? that's a somewhat random notion and not entirely relevant as social media is about the lowest hanging fruit any of us could conjure.
so you believe yourself to be privacy-minded, yeah. i had already gathered that much. my point was that there's all but no such thing and typically merely only the illusion of 'privacy by-default'—hence the lonely, lonely world in which you could only claim to live.
I fail to understand your perception in which I am lonely just because I don’t leave a breadcrumbs everywhere for state and commercial actors (whose interests don’t align with mine) to find.
i don't think you're lonely. i was simply employing sarcasm to suggest that maybe the private world you merely believe yourself to live in doesn't actually exist. not for any of us, myself included.
we're definitely replying past each other a bit. i now realize after seeing a few of your other comments throughout this thread that your opinions surrounding personal privacy are much more aligned with my own than i think your opinions on CGNAT represent.
so you believe yourself to be privacy-minded, yeah. i had already gathered that much. my point was that there's all but no such thing and typically merely only the illusion of 'privacy by-default'—hence the lonely, lonely world in which you could only claim to live.