Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don’t think most people (besides some naive readings of that research) should come to that conclusion. The proper conclusion is that it will offset some of the calories burned by exercise through reduction in NEAT (non exercise activity thermogenesis), but not all of it. So a 600cal exercise may only have an effective net calorie addition of say, 400cal, due to reduction in NEAT.

The problem becomes when people do the naive calculation of exercise calories (Eg, I ran 2 miles so I burned 400cal, so I can eat 400 extra calories), and come to the wrong conclusion.




The comment I replied to stated that was the conclusion - 600 burned meant 600 saved. So apparently the misinterpretation is common.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: