Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Nothing will ensure incumbency better than slapping more regs on it



Is incumbency a bad thing if they’ve to serve everyone equally and at prices that are fair? It’s not like they operate without any regs at all today, right?


It is a bad thing bc it stifles innovation and ultimately hurts everyone but incumbent shareholders and their pocket legislators. And on the latter point it is also unlikely to be “fair”


Yes, you only regulate a monopoly after you've decided that competition is impossible.


I think we need to be more proactive than that personally. Lots of big companies do anti competitive things that we don’t want even if they aren’t exactly a monopoly. But no one’s doing anything about that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: