I'm guessing the other possibility is requiring a third party entity, like a university professor in CS, to testify unlikeliness of computer malfunction due to cosmic rays && bugs, for each and every computer generated evidences.
If the `alleged theft amount by defendant` == (unsigned int)((int)-1), that should cover those cases, at least in theory. The profs would just blindly vouch it, but at least it'll be a point.
Nope nope nope and nope. The author of the software and their source code shall be interrogated on the witness stand by one of their peers and a proof checker.
That'd be ideal! Require expert testimonials and judges with Master's in CS and EE or better for any court sessions involving computers. Up to UK people though.
If the `alleged theft amount by defendant` == (unsigned int)((int)-1), that should cover those cases, at least in theory. The profs would just blindly vouch it, but at least it'll be a point.