I much prefer this to the typical path of the celebrated founder:
1) Be young
2) Go to Stanford / MIT / Harvard
3) Drop out after freshman autumn
4) Get ludicrous funding via family connections
5) Crash & burn because you're about as knowledgeable as one would expect a kid fresh out of high school to be
Statistically, the smartest person in a cohort of five million has an IQ of roughly 180. Above-average 45 year olds are not competing with 20 year olds with IQ's of 180. They may cooperate, but they tend to work in different problem spaces, much like how a streetball player isn't in direct competition with LeBron James even though they're both basketball players.
IQ as commonly indicated includes an age adjustment, so in this case their IQs would be similar before adjustment. They would be cooperating with each other usually, not competing.
1) Be young 2) Go to Stanford / MIT / Harvard 3) Drop out after freshman autumn 4) Get ludicrous funding via family connections 5) Crash & burn because you're about as knowledgeable as one would expect a kid fresh out of high school to be