Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Similarly an empty input field that is css'd to be outside the viewport is often filled by spambots but not humans. But I like the edge case UX of your idea more.



Just watch out that Chrome’s autofill doesn’t fill it in. Cost us a huge chunk of new signups until we found out. Chrome ignores autofill directives under some circumstances.


It's also visible for users with CSS overrides and/or other browser inpairments. The more I think about it the more strongly I prefer the "type 42" explicit input field.


You can label it “leave this field empty”, with a placeholder or similar - then it’s the same explicit instruction as “type 42”.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: