> But at the very least it's often interesting to see how traditional systems are reimagined in order to enable decentralized, trustless, computer programs
They are not re-imagined. It's a combination of a still on-ongoing gold rush (well, the end tail of it) and people pretending there are purely technical solutions to all problems.
Almost every single of those "interesting re-imagining" projects rather quickly rediscovers why traditional systems are the way they are, and end up being shittier versions of those.
Whatever your feelings on the impact of the technology are, you can't possibly know this
> Almost every single of those "interesting re-imagining" projects rather quickly rediscovers why traditional systems are the way they are, and end up being shittier versions of those.
I pretty much agree with this, though I'd suggest "most" rather than "almost every".
Most scientific studies may fail to support their hypothesis also, that doesn't make them uninteresting.
They are not re-imagined. It's a combination of a still on-ongoing gold rush (well, the end tail of it) and people pretending there are purely technical solutions to all problems.
Almost every single of those "interesting re-imagining" projects rather quickly rediscovers why traditional systems are the way they are, and end up being shittier versions of those.