Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I guess.

It just seems like the degree of premeditation involved here would also come to the conclusion, given how over invested we are in our military, that is better to make it seem like the US is perpetually shooting itself in the foot rather than make it seems like the US has been shot. We tend to get all rambunctious when we know it was an attack, better to have us lose the war before we know we're fighting it.

When it comes to remote vehicle access I think you could do more damage carefully over the course of a decade than you could do rashly in a day.




All a nation-state needs to do to asymmetrically cripple the US is to buy a few hundred junkers and stall them on busy bridges during rush hour.

There's no need for Tom Clancy 46-dimensional chess plots that involve hacking the Gibson.

The next time you see your neighbour driving poorly, ask yourself - are they a spy, wrecker, or saboteur? (/s)


Agreed. But the game being played here is the inverse: assume someone hacked the Gibson, what effects do we see?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: