Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is a strange article. There are slow writers, there are fast writers. It seems that each writer is in a way different like… like any person! So..?



While people like to extol the slow artist, research shows that the most proflific artists are also the artists that produce the "best" stuff.

Prolific artists get more practice; they get more feedback; they get more opportunities.


But are they prolific due to speed or consistency? I think consistency plays the bigger role.

Stephen King writes about 1,000 words per day, consistently. Some other writers may do much more in a single day, but are more sporadic, “when inspiration strikes.”

Eminem has been prolific and is well known for his writing. I read an account from Akon working with Eminem in the stupid where he said Eminem treats music like a job. He shows up in the morning, works, takes his lunch break, works, and is done at 5pm. He’s showing up consistently, and he’s writing constantly, most of which will never been seen.

Jerry Seinfeld also famously wrote a joke every single day, not breaking the streak.

With this much practice, it would make sense that they’d get faster of time, but someone who is slow and consist will be much more prolific throughout the course of a lifetime, than someone who is fast, but inconsistent.


> …someone who is slow and consist will be much more prolific throughout the course of a lifetime, than someone who is fast, but inconsistent.

In this parable¹, the teacher divided a ceramics class into two groups. One was graded solely on the quantity of work they produced, and the other solely on its quality. The result was that the "quantity" group also created higher-quality work.

King is a "quantity" guy, which means that the quality of his work is inconsistent, but he releases a lot of high-quality work.

GRRM is a "quality" guy, which means he may not finish the A Song of Ice and Fire series before he dies.

¹ https://excellentjourney.net/2015/03/04/art-fear-the-ceramic...


The question remains:

Does quantity map to speed or consistency?

Maybe it depends whether it’s an individual or group effort?

For an individual, the feedback loop would seem to have a speed limit, as they’d need to evaluate the prior work and try to improve upon it.

Whereas in a team, individuals can churn out quantity and an editor can pick the best of the batch.


George Lucas hates writing. He only got the screenplay to Star Wars: A New Hope written by locking himself in an office with a pad of paper and pencils for eight hours every day, through several drafts. Whether he actually wrote anything varied day by day.


I think the value in this case is for the slow writer (or slow creator of anything) who perceives it to be a race (gotta go work for Big Corp and crank out PRs faster than the next guy).

When a person is stuck in that belief, which they often don’t explicitly realize, to have the realization that slow-but-high-quality is a viable path is a big unlock, and potentially a huge weight off their shoulders.


The market selects for fast writers and tends to pay them more




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: