If it's the one I'm thinking of: the title was about government, but all of the examples in the article were private firms with profit motives. The author implied that government must work the same way as industry, but that's a huge assumption.
The article had no examples of public agencies perpetuating the problems they set out to solve.
It's because the article and website is stupid, and is trying to make you believe public agencies are ineffective on principle.
Public agencies don't exist because of profit. They exists because of government mandate.
Also the website states it's just a single PHD that claims "I created Effectiviology to provide people with research-based information about psychology and philosophy they can use.", but it's in reality owned by 'Super Privacy Service LTD' according to https://www.whois.com/whois/effectiviology.com.
The article had no examples of public agencies perpetuating the problems they set out to solve.