Pure CSS. Invalid HTML. Nice job tho. Now just need to make it in 3D.

assimpleaspossi · 2024-03-22T23:43:19 1711150999

I wasn't going to mention the invalid HTML. Thank you for doing it.

xp84 · 2024-03-23T02:04:41 1711159481

I thought we all agreed to ignore validity a while back when XHTML gave way to HTML5.

userbinator · 2024-03-23T05:41:20 1711172480

Indeed, the fact that HTML5 specified the exact way to turn any stream of bytes into a DOM means that "error" cases are really just academic/theoretical.

pests · 2024-03-23T03:15:03 1711163703

How is XHTML any more valid than HTML 5?

tredre3 · 2024-03-23T20:19:16 1711225156

XHTML had to be valid XML, that was the entire shtick.

Comparatively HTML5 is very lenient in its spec. Browsers are even more lenient in their implementation.

pests · 2024-03-24T07:09:23 1711264163

It has a pretty well defined spec. It's just not XML, and I think that's okay.

Do you have any examples of undefined or linient rules?

I'm a big fan of optional closing tags that HTML5 has. Can do stuff like:

  <h2> Todo List
  <ul>
   <li> Do task A
   <li> Do task B
  <p> Dear Diary, ...

Almost as easy as markdown. Couldn't get this working with XML.

archiewood · 2024-03-23T03:24:13 1711164253

I cheated for brevity :S