There is another _shocking_ realization in this work: there are 11 types of people: those who know what binary means, those who don't, and those who say they do but actually don't.
"The era of 1-bit LLMs"
Representing { -1, 0, 1 } can't be done with 1-bit, I'm sorry -- and sad, please let's all get back to something vaguely sound and rigorous.
> please let's all get back to something vaguely sound and rigorous
Something rigorous would be to actually read the paper rather than stop at the first part of its title. The authors are not claiming their LLM is 1-bit.
"The era of 1-bit LLMs"
Representing { -1, 0, 1 } can't be done with 1-bit, I'm sorry -- and sad, please let's all get back to something vaguely sound and rigorous.