>I am not worried at all all about the climate. I don’t believe for a bit that human CO2 output has any noticeable effect on the climate.
Is there anything that would falsify your beliefs, and what is your explanation for global warming? Looking at the first point
>Economics Professor and CO2 Coalition Board Director Dr. Bruce Everett discusses the fact that predicted massive temperatures have not materialized. He says that science is one thing only: comparing ideas against empirical evidence. If empirical evidence doesn't support your idea, it isn't scientific.
What does "massive temperatures" even mean and who was promising them? You can see a compilation of forecasted models vs what happened here[1] and here[2]. One often hears of the corrupt climate scientists selling alarmist lies that don't pan out, but few people seem to bother actually looking into who in the past made accurate predictions about the future. I'll give you a hint - it wasn't the people who denied co2 could cause climate change.
Is there anything that would falsify your beliefs, and what is your explanation for global warming? Looking at the first point
>Economics Professor and CO2 Coalition Board Director Dr. Bruce Everett discusses the fact that predicted massive temperatures have not materialized. He says that science is one thing only: comparing ideas against empirical evidence. If empirical evidence doesn't support your idea, it isn't scientific.
What does "massive temperatures" even mean and who was promising them? You can see a compilation of forecasted models vs what happened here[1] and here[2]. One often hears of the corrupt climate scientists selling alarmist lies that don't pan out, but few people seem to bother actually looking into who in the past made accurate predictions about the future. I'll give you a hint - it wasn't the people who denied co2 could cause climate change.
[1] https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-how-well-have-climate-m... [2] https://climate.nasa.gov/news/2943/study-confirms-climate-mo...