Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

How should the environmental movement frame things?



The moral failure of humanity is not really that we're harming the world, but that we are harming humans. Humans affected by climate change today, and the future humans elsewhere, who will also suffer.

In some way, one animal causing the extinction of others extracting resources and changing the environment is as long as evolutionary biology itself. This is what all animals do. We're just doing it at a much bigger scale.


Finding ways for humans to live well now without consuming their children’s ability to do the same in the future.

A good framing would also draw a link to fiscal responsibility. A renewable sustainable civilization is paying its bills fully. Fossil fuels and other non renewable processes are putting it on a credit card, and one with an unknown interest rate. Eventually you can’t do that anymore and the interest comes due. Right now humanity is still putting something like 75% of its primary energy use on credit.

The worst framing is the anti-human framing you see from radical greens or films like Avatar. If you really hate humans the logical thing would be to do nothing and let us crap where we eat until we render our environment inhospitable to us. If humans are the problem the activists should go home.


>A good framing would also draw a link to fiscal responsibility

A good analogy with an under the table jab really. The worst of the ultra green policies are absolutely murder for financial responsibility.

There is no winning with the current “debate”, and double so with current “solutions”.


Save ourselves and our children.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: