So he's actually thinking of ways to improve the work environment for woman, and people are blaming him for saying that woman are not suitable for the work?
It's not about what you say, it's about how the article reporting on you describes you.
"We could do these changes at Google to make it a better place for women." "So, what you are saying is that women are biologically incapable of working at current Google? Our female colleagues at HR department are so triggered they literally can't stop crying!"
What's the implication of "There's some roles we can't accomodate to make them more suitable for women" for you (which is literally said in the paper) ?
