Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"teach you all".

So you don't know enough to evaluate the answers. Or where to find the original sources it quoted or mixed.




Original sources aren’t necessarily infallible either, but that’s beside the point, asking ChatGPT needs to be viewed as asking a person to recount something from memory. It hasn’t been reviewed or edited so it’s like a first draft rather than a published document. That’s the error that people tend to make since they treat it like a search engine instead of a conversation.


> they treat it like a search engine instead of a conversation.

That's because web searches are so polluted that for a lot of purposes even ChatGPT 3.5 is better.


Um yes I do? Lol why do you just assume this?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: