1. We don’t have immediate plans to bring other languages to the front-end — maybe TypeScript, but that’s just stripping annotations; maybe some WebAssembly. Our idea is to have a clear serializable “membrane” separating your back-end (in any language, running on build on your servers) from your front-end (in JavaScript, running on load in the client). Data loaders produce data during build, which gets handed-off to the client to render. Trying to do data processing on the client is often a frustrating and poor user experience. Likewise trying to render great interactive charts without web technologies is quite limiting!
2. I can’t speak to Quarto’s plans. Observable Framework is open-source so they might pick up some of this stuff. I look at Framework more as an alternative to Quarto than a complement.
3. As the creator of Observable Plot (and D3 before that), I’m a huge fan of visualization grammars! Apache Echarts is a chart typology, and while it’s got a lot of chart types in it, it has no overarching conceptual model of how to represent a visualization. And so it’s not very interesting. But “the proof of the pudding is in the eating” as I say in the post, so I encourage you to look at Observable Plot and decide for yourself if you like both the syntax and the resulting plots. I certainly do!
Leland Wilkinson said it best: “If we endeavor to develop a charting instead of a graphing program, we will accomplish two things. First, we inevitably will offer fewer charts than people want. Second, our package will have no deep structure. Our computer program will be unnecessarily complex, because we will fail to reuse objects or routines that function similarly in different charts. And we will have no way to add new charts to our system without generating complex new code. Elegant design requires us to think about a theory of graphics, not charts.”
See Leland Wilkinson’s The Grammar of Graphics. He describes the difference between a chart typology (a fixed set of chart types with a fixed set of configuration options) and a grammar of graphics (a set of orthogonal primitives that can be composed in arbitrary ways).
2. I can’t speak to Quarto’s plans. Observable Framework is open-source so they might pick up some of this stuff. I look at Framework more as an alternative to Quarto than a complement.
3. As the creator of Observable Plot (and D3 before that), I’m a huge fan of visualization grammars! Apache Echarts is a chart typology, and while it’s got a lot of chart types in it, it has no overarching conceptual model of how to represent a visualization. And so it’s not very interesting. But “the proof of the pudding is in the eating” as I say in the post, so I encourage you to look at Observable Plot and decide for yourself if you like both the syntax and the resulting plots. I certainly do!
Leland Wilkinson said it best: “If we endeavor to develop a charting instead of a graphing program, we will accomplish two things. First, we inevitably will offer fewer charts than people want. Second, our package will have no deep structure. Our computer program will be unnecessarily complex, because we will fail to reuse objects or routines that function similarly in different charts. And we will have no way to add new charts to our system without generating complex new code. Elegant design requires us to think about a theory of graphics, not charts.”