Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

You're using one product that blocks ads and trackers, but then bypassing that with another product that deliberately provides access to ads and trackers, but via a third party.

What is the point of the latter?




I subscribed + configured my router to use NextDNS years ago so ads + trackers are blocked on my IoT devices. More recently, I inherited a MacBook and now an iPhone and naturally enabled their built-in blocking capabilities. I think I assumed two blockers are better than one but now I just leave Apple's IP limiting features off and let NextDNS do its thing but it just feels weird to deliberately turn off a privacy feature.


This is not two ad blockers. One is an ad blocker the other is a tracking blocker. They conflict simply.

If you want both across all apps (not just the Browser) you need a VPN service with included as locking, such as protonVPN, IVPN, Etc. There are a lot.


but NextDNS' own homepage says it "blocks ads and trackers on websites and in apps" - https://nextdns.io


Yes, they are a DNS ad blocker. iCloud private relay is a tracking blocker, to hide your IP. Both are not compatible in general, unless the "IP tracking blocker" explicitly allows to configure nextDNS as a DNS server, which is not the case of private relay.

I guess nextDNS should list exceptions like private relay, but the list is long and it's confusing. For all intend and purposes I agree with the statement, they block ads on most devices.

They also have help articles specifically for VONs:

https://help.nextdns.io/t/60hgxn7/guide-using-openvpn-nextdn...

Seems doc about private relay is missing though...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: