Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I don't get it. If the collect call from A to B is accepted, B pays the cost of the call. In your scenario B instead calls A directly... and B still pays the cost. Where's the savings here?

(And there's a pretty clear downside to this. What if it's an actual emergency from a different phone than the standard. E.g. the only time I can remember answering a collect call, it was my sister calling from a foreign hospital after a serious accident. Trying to call back at a different number wouldn't have been great. I guess you could have a protocol involving multiple collect calls, and hope that there's no record that the first one was rejected.)




The A-B collect rate might be $3/min because collect calls carry absurd, insane, incomprehensibly whackass surcharges.

The B-A call back rate might be $0.20/min because it's just a normal call, not subject to the above fees.

There's the savings.


"Collect call from Bob Weaddababyeetzaboy" : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9JxhTnWrKYs


We had more subtle encoding, but important messages could be sent by collect calls that would definitely be refused.


Collect calls carry an additional operator fee, unless rejected.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: