This strikes me as a top ten list searching for content. It's a shotgun-blast of advice: there's a big hole in the wall but it's not clear if there was a target.
If HN were to have a programmatic dampening of "top N list" submission ratings, I would not complain.
I'll agree with that, no need to knock what others are doing in making the suggestion though, but you're right, he could have at least added some of his own content
just remember that the single most impactful, game-changing, and profitable revolution in web uis in the last ten years was the dramatic simplicity of the google homepage...DESIGNED BY TWO UNIX SYSTEMS HACKERS!
Not saying it's not true. But are we sure we have a cause-effect here? Sure it worked, it was liked. Bu if they had a different UI, would they be nowhere now?
I think it helped. It wasn't the ONLY factor (the search engine was pretty good too ;)), but I think displaying results faster (smaller page size, more focused UI), contributes positively to the experience.
Perhaps there are UIs that would have resulted in faster growth or more total marketshare, but there are definitely UIs that would have made things far worse. I think the "headroom" for growth is pretty low, there were so many competing services then, if you can remember, that I find it hard to believe that there was only Google with a different looking interface.
If HN were to have a programmatic dampening of "top N list" submission ratings, I would not complain.