I've been attempting this but have paused the efforts due to what seems like lack of interest -- giving me an indication that the problem is not that big of a deal.[0][1]
If anyone is interested in my resuming them, let me know at contact at weedonandscott dot com
I don't disagree, but usually when a solution doesn't fix a painful problem, people are almost disappointed after getting their hopes high. In those posts, the commenters give me the impression that they are mildly annoyed at best (or worst).
I can't speak for the VFX post, but I think the gamedev post shows the weaknesses of git in one line:
> Git does have problems, we’ve had processes fall over on projects, many times actually, but it’s always solvable.
Every team that I've worked on would replace that tool with someonthing more stable if it existed. It does for version control, and it's perfoce, which comes with a hefty license fee, and a _different_ set of problems.
The selling point of Pipetrack is the commutativity, but to echo the comments in those threads, I've never found myself wanting commutavity. In games I want a mainline branch, support for large assets, granular access controls, performant, shared global system, and a method to cleanly differentiate between wip changes and ready changes in a way that works with non-technical users, and won't be the highest individual line item per-user subscription we pay for. Unless the selling point of your tool fixes one or many of those problems, it's not going to help in games.
Honestly, I think we'd be better off on SVN than git most of the time, but the _tooling_ around git is far superior.
Yes, to both. P4 itself is solid, but it's a very chatty protocol and is very latency sensitive. Running a master in the us, with clients in europe is painful for everyone involved. Replicas and edge servers come with other tradeoffs too.
As a developer, doing things like "I only want this subtree of the stream" is hard. Virtual streams exist, but they have a (non-negligible) overhead on the server. It has some quirks due to it being 30 years old which make it... interesting, to work with sometimes.
Of all the complaints I have about p4, support is actually one I'm ok with. They've pretty consistently helped me fix issues over the years (plenty of which are bugs on their side that they have fixed after I raised it). Their sla is good, and their engineers are usually good at troubleshooting.
That totally depends on where you put value. We're a fraction of other companies licenses for comparison. Also, we have new pricing for our new Helix Core Cloud SaaS product!
Yeah. New pricing, but not cheaper. Don't get me wrong. It's a fine price to pay for a studio going strong. But there is no way I can use it for starting my side-project indie game.
There are? Like what?