It's a statement of opinion. I think attempting to use a language without a standard causes problems that can be avoided by using one with a standard. As evidenced in this exact post, the author spent a fair amount of time trying to figure out if the nightly, devel or production versions of the complier were implicated.
He wasn't even able to fully test a theory because he relied on a feature that wasn't even available in older compilers in a completely unrelated system.
So, if you want to ignore these costs, that's fine, I'm not prescribing your actions for you, just sharing an opinion. Do you follow?
He wasn't even able to fully test a theory because he relied on a feature that wasn't even available in older compilers in a completely unrelated system.
So, if you want to ignore these costs, that's fine, I'm not prescribing your actions for you, just sharing an opinion. Do you follow?