> Then that means it’s a big gain for the population of the world and she could not have left soon enough.
How do you come to that conclusion? It's not like just because she's gone means that Meta will stop doing anything that she implemented. She could leave and Meta changes nothing about what they do, and there would be 0 gain for the "population of the world" that you seem think will happen.
> I hope mark finds himself rudderless and meanders the company into a whirlpool,
As if. The Zuck will find someone else to lead, and our luck it will be someone with even less self control or care about the users than the person leaving. Sometimes, the devil you know is much more preferable to the devil that could come after.
We can see how well either of our comments age though
How do you come to that conclusion? It's not like just because she's gone means that Meta will stop doing anything that she implemented. She could leave and Meta changes nothing about what they do, and there would be 0 gain for the "population of the world" that you seem think will happen.
> I hope mark finds himself rudderless and meanders the company into a whirlpool,
As if. The Zuck will find someone else to lead, and our luck it will be someone with even less self control or care about the users than the person leaving. Sometimes, the devil you know is much more preferable to the devil that could come after.
We can see how well either of our comments age though