Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Becaues Clascal/Object Pascal had an enormous number of non-standard extensions to make it a much more system and apps oriented language than the 1973 version. I believe Bill Atkinson was involved in the decision. Same story with TurboPascal and Delphi.

Walter's complaint is partially that it needed extensions to do anything non-educational on 1973 hardware. This is true, but to me is vaguely non-sensical, as it clearly had not been designed for that and was labelled as such.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: