Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

>The other poster wasn't participating in an argument with Matt Walsh.

not required.




No argument, no fallacy. Logic 101 son.


Again, not required.


>Gratuitous verbal abuse or "name-calling" is not on its own an example of the abusive argumentum ad hominem logical fallacy

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling

Don't bother responding with another "no."


>Don't bother responding with another "no."

Go fuck yourself.

That better?


At least you've dispensed with any possibility that you're discussing this in good faith. Your flagged comment was nonsensical, please spend some time reacquainting yourself with basic logic and the nuances of fallacies before embarrassing yourself again in the future.


Use a cactus.


I'm uninterested in your deviant proclivities.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: