I was making the point that the web server can just keep getting updated by virtue of being part of an active server. Separately, the site doesn't need any updating / maintenance.
The same person or people who run the servers aren't necessarily the same person or people who make the web sites.
People can just as easily have static sites on SDF.org. There'd be no reason for anyone to fret about whether the servers are up to date.
Also, nobody ever needs to "migrate the whole stack to newer versions". That's just not a thing with a static site.
Of course, I'm generally on the side which maintains the servers. Some of these servers happen to be my own servers which stores my own stuff.
BTW, I'm on SDF. I love these guys. They sometimes nuke my TTRSS user, but that's OK. :D
The whole stack, at least in my parlance, means anything and everything between your (static) webpage and hardware. From kernel to the server which serves your page.
IOW, I use stack as in "LAMP" stack. In this case it's only LA, but it's a stack nonetheless.
The same person or people who run the servers aren't necessarily the same person or people who make the web sites.
People can just as easily have static sites on SDF.org. There'd be no reason for anyone to fret about whether the servers are up to date.
Also, nobody ever needs to "migrate the whole stack to newer versions". That's just not a thing with a static site.