And god willing if there is any justice in the courts NYTimes will lose this frivolous lawsuit.
Copyright law is a prehistoric and corrupt system that has been about protecting the profit margins of Disney and Warner Bros rather than protecting real art and science for living memory. Unless copy/paste superhero movies are your definition of art I suppose.
Unfortunately it seems like judges and the general public are so clueless as to how this technology works it might get regulated into the ground by uneducated people before it ever has a chance to take off. All so we can protect endless listicle factories. What a shame.
> Copyright law is a prehistoric and corrupt system that has been about protecting the profit margins of Disney and Warner Bros rather than protecting real art
These types of arguments miss the mark entirely imho. First and foremost, not every instance of copyrighted creation involves a giant corporation. Second, what you are arguing against is the unfair leverage corporations have when negotiating a deal with a rising artist.
https://www.rentadoll.in
this escort is exciting and very charming because high-class call girls in Mahipalpur escort a very different service is women will be described to clients in very softly erotic and sexual service in clients so beautiful movements so can try it mahipalpur call girls service is interesting and unlimited fun of women.
Clearly, "theft" is an analogy here (since we can't get it to fit exactly), but we can work with it.
You are correct, if I were to steal something, surely I can be made to give it back to you. However, if I haven't actually stolen it, there is nothing for me to return.
By analogy, if OpenAI copied data from the NYT, they should be able to at least provide a reference. But if they don't actually have a proper copy of it, they cannot.
