Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Can't argue with that! :-)

For what it's worth, you can keep both, and make parallel vs sequential execution an option, with a boolean flag.

You can also leave the sequential code as a comment explaining what the parallel code does.

Or, if slow execution doesn't bother you, leave it as is.




You're replying to somebody who was arguing for readability being its virtue and you're proposing ... adding options and alternate code paths? :)


Touché. I just updated my comment :-)


Via a boolean parameter, no less.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: