> I think you misunderstood the attack. The idea behind the attack is that the attacker would create what is effectively a honey pot website, which writer.com customers want to use as a source for some reason
Or you use any number of existing exploits to put malicious content on compromised websites.
And considering the “malicious content” in this case is simply plain text that is only malicious to LLMs parsing the site, it seems unlikely it would be detected.
Or you use any number of existing exploits to put malicious content on compromised websites.
And considering the “malicious content” in this case is simply plain text that is only malicious to LLMs parsing the site, it seems unlikely it would be detected.