You skipped an important part of the quote from RFC-7519[0] (later replaced by two RFCs[1],[2] without the strange suggestion):
> The suggested pronunciation of JWT is the same as the English word "jot".
Replaced by RFC-7797[1] and RFC-8725[2], neither of which have the pronunciation suggestion. There was also an errata about the pronunciation line[3], which probably explains the mismatch.
> The suggested pronunciation of JWT is the same as the English word "jot".
Replaced by RFC-7797[1] and RFC-8725[2], neither of which have the pronunciation suggestion. There was also an errata about the pronunciation line[3], which probably explains the mismatch.
[0]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7519 [1]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7797 [2]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8725 [3]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5648