Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think you are possibly missing the possibility that going from 4^k to 3.993^k might involve learning something new about the problem. Frequently learning something new is more important than the absolute magnitude of the improvement.



> might involve learning something new about the problem

I think that's almost literally what sfink said though:

> > they're creating a whole new form of proof that will almost certainly allow further decreases




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: