The most astounding statement is this:
“What do Americans have to pay for if we give them everything they ask for?” they noted. These sources insist that Spain openly collaborates with the United States, and always exchanges information. According to these sources, the number of times in which Spain has refused to share information of interest to Washington is “between one and zero.”
Either this is a lie, the USA and Spain have zero competing interests, Spain absolutely ignores it's own laws and regulations or Spain gave up on being an independent country. I can't imagine a world where the USA shares everything with Spain, so I can't image why would Spain share everything with the USA.
Why do you think that? Germany didn't even protest when it was revealed that the USA spied on the phone of chancellor Merkel, the BND sent siphoned german internet traffic to the NSA in an act of treason, and flight passenger data is sent to the USA without receiving such data in return. And again and again the EU enables data transfer programs into the USA, even though it is known the USA does not protect that data from access and that thus all such agreements are illegal.
In such questions, European states repeatedly bow completely to the USA. I don't see why it would be different with Spain.
Countries spy on each other constantly, it's just that articles about the US doing so receive far more clicks. Europe does a similar amount of spying on the US, here's a couple articles where it's revealed or they admit it:
How do you mean protest? Do you mean people in the streets? No, that didn't happen.
Do you mean inter-governmental protest in the form of summoning an ambassador and dressing them down? In the form of sternly worded demarches asking for clarification? In diplomatic discussions that frankly announced our relationship was injured? Yes that very much happened. A relationship was impaired and Germany was quite diplomatically clear about it.
Diplomatic protest does not need to be public to be effective.
USA is supporting Morocco and Morocco has had a long problem with Sahara and claims for Ceuta and Melilla, spanish cities. Also they want to take over at some point Canary Islands.
Americans are playing two faces here: Spain is our friend and at the same time they are supporting Morocco.
It is not nice IMHO. Last year after more than four decades of Shara conflict between Morocco and saharauis the soanish government suddenly changed position for this topic with zero explanation. Something government knows most citizens are against. I think americans forced Spain to do it.
On the way we had a conflict with Algeria, which is who provided us with cheap gas. It is a stupid movement forced from outside.
At the same time, Israel normalized relations with Morocco, putting an embassy there. And now they are in Sahara mining...
Is this all by chance? I doubt it. It is all planned. Against our own interests.
Who do you think sold that to our neighbours? No, they are playing two decks and harming us on the way.
I do not have anything against americans per se, but they have a big responsibility on what happened in Europe lately and they are also playing two decks there for many reasons I won't explain here now, but Nordstream/Germany's russian gas is one of the topics, if not the topic.
Anyway, I prefer to leave it here and comment more about other news, particularly technology, which is what I enjoy the most.
Feel free to reply, I just do not want to start a long thread about this since it is inside HN policies to talk about these topics the less the better :)
Have you ever traveled in Western Sahara, on both sides of the berm? Especially over a span of time that would allow you to witness the changes that have occurred in the region’s demography? The indigenous Saharawi population is so small now it could hardly form a viable state, especially one able to resist migrant flows from further south. As the other poster said, European states’ foreign policy now is strongly driven by migration concerns. Yes, the marginalization of the Saharawi from their own region is a result of Morocco’s occupation, and that can be lamented, but the damage is already done.
You’ll notice that I already spoke of the Moroccan occupation in my post. Repeating the point in more strident language only makes it look like you are trying to engage in political battle on HN.
Spain is largely a vassal state of the US but also of Germany. As such, it depends on these countries for most of its intelligence. It would be counter productive for Spain to refuse cooperation given its membership of EU and NATO. Spain is on the firing line of NATO's "enemies" because of its relatively weak state, so it would be very audacious of Spain to betray its masters. Spain's political class certainly wouldn't have the appetite for it
So (for example) Portugal was able to choose a non-austerity strategy to get out of the GFC while Spain was coerced by Germany to follow an austerity strategy? If that is what you mean, could you please provide any kind of evidence for that coercion? What makes Spain special in that regard (e. g. compared to Portugal)?
The main reason I think it played out differently is that Portugal is considered more united in its other political views than Spain. Even in Portugal the 2015 election that ended (sort of) the austerity policies was highly contentious/fractious. Madrid could not tolerate that kind of clusterfuck without also risking e.g. Catalonian independence. Related to that Portugal also does not have the other half Spain does, the US political backing which works in tandem with the German economic power.
That said, if you listen to German politicians they still don't believe Portugal is out of the GFC and would reinstitute austerity there in a heartbeat given the chance.
I am still missing any evidence Germany exerted any pressure in that regard. It would be different for Greece, obviously.
> That said, if you listen to German politicians they still don't believe Portugal is out of the GFC and would reinstitute austerity there in a heartbeat given the chance.
If you listen to the larger parties of the current German government they would like to "modify" the "Schuldenbremse" (self-inflicted limitation on debt, fixed on constitutional level) to be able to raise more debt. And even in the conservative party the respect for austerity is declining along with the financial well-being of the German federal states.
I am not quite sure what you are hinting at. Could you please clarify?
The only large-scale aid Germany is providing to other EU countries I am aware of are their (internally not disputed) EU contributions. But if I remember correctly Spain is not a large net receiver from those contributions either (barely a net receiver). Also, Germany could not change that without leaving the EU, so I am not sure how that would be any leverage.
I mean the realpolitik of increasing the EU budget, currently for the aid for Ukraine. (If I'm not mistaken.)
Back after 2009 the whole discourse was about bailing out the southern banks, of course not via direct aid, but via ECB operations, standing up various credit/emergency facilities, basically anything that leads to more gross EU credit risk (or risk sharing).
It's cheap propaganda for internal purposes. Everyone spies on everyone. Like there are, IDK, Czech Republic spies in the US. Discovery of "friendly" spies is handled gracefully - no one gets killed, no one gets jumped in a back alley by unidentified perpetrators, and no one even goes to prison. That is assuming you don't turn the spies around to work for you.
I don't get it why this is on HN, it is not particularly significant and it is definitely not related to tech.
However, HN isn’t only about tech. HN is about fascination for the world from a scientific angle. Most on HN are techies, so that explains its tech bias.
“anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.” [1]
“Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, or celebrities, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon.”
^ This does not justify the current topic that strongly. It does justify the fascination for the world from a science perspective angle. It also corroborates your part about stating it’s not particularly significant.
For me, the good faith view of all of this IMO is that having a discussion about friendly states spying on each other with this crowd is interesting enough.
> Either this is a lie, the USA and Spain have zero competing interests, Spain absolutely ignores it's own laws and regulations or Spain gave up on being an independent country.
Or the spy chiefs in the USA know exactly what they can ask from their Spanish counterparts and how so they avoid asking things the Spanish cannot legally fulfill.
For example the USA can ask for Spanish defense information, which the Spanish agencies share with them since they see themselves playing on the same team. The USA can ask for information on criminals and terrorist and non-affiliated spies operating in Spain, which Spain shares with them since they are playing in the same team. And presumably the USA is wise enough to not ask for compromat on Spanish leaders or things which undermine legitimate Spanish business interests.
> or Spain gave up on being an independent country
If you want to put it that bluntly. Have you heard the term Pax Americana? This is how it looks like from the ground up. Countries have the choice of being aligned with America (in which case they receive various boons) or not (in which case they receive pain and suffering in all kind of diffuse ways). Countries (and individuals in the countries) then make the rational choice. If you want to be crass about it you can describe it as giving up on being an independent country. In reality it is more like they accept to colour inside certain lines to achieve a greater prosperity for themselves.
Things like they can build regular weapons, but they can’t aim those weapons at the USA, or they can’t sell those weapons to unaligned countries.
> Spain absolutely ignores it's own laws and regulations.
Which regulation would those be? The GDPR and similar laws explicitly exclude state intelligence agencies and the like.
> I can't imagine a world where the USA shares everything with Spain, so I can't image why would Spain share everything with the USA.
Spain can assume the US has sufficient resources to know anything it cares to anyway, and Spain doesn't have an empire spanning the globe. The US does. One party has a lot more to lose by revealing everything.
>I can't imagine a world where the USA shares everything with Spain, so I can't image why would Spain share everything with the USA.
I'm sure it's not everything, but it's certainly asymmetric given that Spain (like any NATO country) outsources much of its security to the United States.
Either this is a lie, the USA and Spain have zero competing interests, Spain absolutely ignores it's own laws and regulations or Spain gave up on being an independent country. I can't imagine a world where the USA shares everything with Spain, so I can't image why would Spain share everything with the USA.