Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Well to be fair, there’s no objective measure of “best” which makes this debate pretty pointless.

But also, why would I want to hire the best? Wouldn’t that mean that I can’t make a decision until I’ve seen all the candidates? Why don’t I simply look for the first that meets the requirements of the job?

> If you get a job offer it means that you were the best candidate that was available to the company

Again, I’ll disagree here. If you get an offer from the company it means that you got an offer from the company. You can tell yourself it was because you were the best available, but probably not true.




You try to hire the best candidate you see. At least that's what I've always tried to do on the other side of the interviewing table...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: