Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Oh look the exact type of shaming OP was talking about.



And so they should be shamed. There are professionals working on every aspect of a film, and these options just shit all over their work, ruining their intended vision.

Now if you're talking about watching YouTube or similar content then it's a different story.


"Vision" implies that there is a choice. How many feature films have been made at a frame rate other than 24fps? Ever since the sound era, I suspect you can count them all on your fingers.

So I don't buy this "vision" argument. It's just holier-than-thou. Directors choose 24fps because it's literally the only option. It's no choice at all.

Forcing me to watch your movie as a jerky motion-sickness-inducing mess? I will indeed, to use your words, shit on it.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: