Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why would that make any sense?

Humans "have their own motives" because we're designed to reproduce. We're designed to reproduce because anything that didn't, over billions of years, no longer exists today.

Why on earth would an artifact produced by gradient descent have its own motives?

This is just an absurd consequence of extrapolating from a sample size of one. The only intelligent thing we know of is humans, humans have their own motives, therefore all intelligent things have their own motives. It's bogus.




i don't think the current generation of GPTs can develop "motives", but the question is if AGI is even possible without it having the ability to develop them.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: