On: A Science of Life Without Free Will by Robert Sapo...

[avgcorrection]

Non sequitur.

[lern_too_spel → avgcorrection]

It follows directly from lack of free will. Lack of free will does not mean that the author makes correct statements about his beliefs all the time.

[avgcorrection → lern_too_spel]

Then you are making an irrelevant statement about the causality of him writing a book. Not about how his apparent belief is incoherent or not.

Thus a non sequitur.

[lern_too_spel → avgcorrection]

I understand what you're saying now. Thanks for spelling out what you meant by your previous comment.

A better response would have been if I spelled out that persuading people not to believe in free will does not require the persuader to believe in free will.