Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Here's my challenge: if this is correct, we then have to assume that 95% of the company is purely profit-motivated since they aligned behind Sam. I'm cynical, but I struggle to be that cynical. I would have expected a few more holdouts in the name of caution, EA, etc. Maybe it's a blindness.



I think it’s reasonable that 95% of people would choose generational wealth for their families given the opportunity.


But at current valuations? With existing licenses already in place? It's not like their commercial value (or value to Microsoft) drops to zero if they stick to the original mission don't license AGI.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: