Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Source? Ben didn't read his cited source in his article yesterday.



Currently, the claim is unproven. However, if I were an investor, I'd be pounding on the doors demanding for clarification.


I meant, can you link the claim that the clause in question got removed?


https://stratechery.com/2023/openais-misalignment-and-micros...

"Microsoft’s original agreement with OpenAI also barred Microsoft from pursuing AGI based on OpenAI tech on its own; my understanding is that this clause was removed in the most recent agreement."

(It's hidden under a citation bubble you need to click after the third paragraph.)


I see. Pursuing AGI sounds distinct from commercializing future versions of ChatGPT based on OpenAI IP. I imagine the exact legal wording in the contract makes all the difference.

The WSJ article from June he cited indicates the license still comes with restrictions.

https://www.wsj.com/articles/microsoft-and-openai-forge-awkw...


I'd have my lawyers do the pounding.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: