> Right now he has the high ground and the board is the one that looks petty and immature.
This is an interesting take. Didn't the board effectively claim that he was lying to or misleading them? If that's true, how does someone doing that and being called out on it given them the high ground? By many accounts that have come out, it seems Altman had several schemes in work going against the charter of the non-profit OpenAI.
> Whether that venture is in AI or not in AI will be very revealing about what he truly believes are the prospects for the space.
This is an interesting take. Didn't the board effectively claim that he was lying to or misleading them? If that's true, how does someone doing that and being called out on it given them the high ground? By many accounts that have come out, it seems Altman had several schemes in work going against the charter of the non-profit OpenAI.
> Whether that venture is in AI or not in AI will be very revealing about what he truly believes are the prospects for the space.
Why is he considered an oracle in this space?