Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

This is like a supervillain origin story, Greg and Sam are 100 % going to start something new now, even if it's just out of spite with how much both seem to have liked their work at OpenAI



If they were popular at OpenAI, I would say they have a good chance of succeeding too. They could offer excellent equity packages to all the best engineers and researchers and due to the non-profit nature of OpenAI (and hence no equity), these people might be very tempted to leave.


OpenAI is supposedly “capped profit” so employees do get equity with limited upside.

But yeah, since Sam and Greg were apparently pushed out because they were building too good of a business any OpenAI employees that were aligned with them are likely to jump ship and join them, and OpenAI will revert to the non-profit research lab it started out as.


Can they do that though? With all the obligations they have to MS.


They just fired OpenAI


Would they even be able to compete with OpenAI at this point? Even without Greg and Sam they have Ilya, the models they've trained so far, institutional knowledge, datasets and billions from Microsoft. Could OpenAI be at escape velocity anyway to AGI just continuing on the track it's been on?


Microsoft got the models. And their compute infrastructure. They’re powerful enough to bleed openai out if it’s in their interest. I’m not sure if there is much trust between the new leadership and microsoft.


There are plenty of investors who would pour billions into these 2. MSFT got it's worth others want too.


> Could OpenAI be at escape velocity anyway to AGI just continuing on the track it's been on?

Could a nuclear energy company be at escape velocity to fusion because they are the best at fission? I wouldn't think so


OpenAI are not on the track to AGI


Greg seems to be much loved by OpenAI employees, and generally inspiring person.


I don't think its possible, at least for the foreseable future, they were heavily over indexed on Azure offering them discounted compute, not like they're gonna buy that amount of GPU elsewhere


I can imagine both Apple and Google happily positioning themselves in the same type of relationship as OpenAI-Microsoft.


Google had internal efforts, and Anthropic already. They definitely don’t have the compute to spare to split with another organization.

Apple surely doesn’t have a cluster that at all compares with the big cloud giants.

Oracle and AWS are really the only cloud left, and oracle is already renting to Microsoft for GPU compute.


>Apple surely doesn’t have a cluster that at all compares with the big cloud giants.

Apple has a lot of cash to throw at it. Question would be if Apple is even interested in it.


They should be. The slight improvements in messaging autocomplete in iOS 17 have made a noticeable difference in my texting. To have an iPhone that understands me, and a Siri that doesn’t say, “Here’s what I found on the web” is extremely valuable.


Idk. It looks like Apple is happy to sell you the hardware to do the image recognition etc on your own device and receive the result. They can claim privacy and save on computation.


Then they can charge.


The problem is that a significant amount of the already-made GPUs are in use. Even if they can afford to throw money at it, where is that money going to go?

The best they can do is out-bid their competitors, for the competitors hardware. I'm sure apple doesn't want to pay Google for GCP resource to train an AI. Again, there may not be enough companies renting out GPUs at all.


Apple is burning through more than a million USD per day for its research on Ajax and Co, they definitely have an interest in building big imo.


That's .1% of their annual expenditures


On the other hand, Anthropic exists, so I am not sure.


ALDI vs. LIDL


ALDI Nord vs Aldi Süd; Adidas vs Puma?


Yes you're correct, thanks!

Edit: apparently ALDI VS LIDL is an urban myth. It's ALDI that was split in two ..


Aldi and Lidl are each other's biggest competitors. Aldi Süd and Nord don't really clash because there is only two markets where both are present: Germany, where they aren't competing though (split in North and South) and the US (Aldi vs. Trader Joe's). Every other country only has one of the two Aldis. Lidl on the other hand is present in most large markets alongside one of the Aldis.


Used to have a LIDL now we have an ALDI




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: