This seems strange that it would be legal for workers in other industries to specifically target a brand.
How can they justify painting some products, but not others as a "work action"? A work action would involve something to do with their terms or state of employment, or actually going on strike and refusing to paint any products.
This looks like a targeted coercion effort against a single brand.
How can they justify painting some products, but not others as a "work action"? A work action would involve something to do with their terms or state of employment, or actually going on strike and refusing to paint any products.
This looks like a targeted coercion effort against a single brand.