Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Google reveals Chrome extensions plan (cnet.com)
19 points by johns on Dec 1, 2008 | hide | past | favorite | 19 comments



Good to see they're planning AdBlock in advance. That'll hopefully shut up the nuts who're saying that Google will do anything to prevent AdBlock on Chrome and that it's all a conspiracy.


Because conspiracy theories are grounded in rational thought...

"They're just saying it, it will never show up" "They'll have secret hooks to get around AdBlock" "They'll have in-browser ads"

&c


"... Good to see they're planning AdBlock in advance. ..."

Does that include a mechanism to block textual adverts as well as image based adverts?


You've got to figure some extensions'll be made by the public. From the specs, it sounds like google will be building extensions. Imo this is a good change, I've always thought firefox should have a team making & maintaining extensions.


"... I've always thought firefox should have a team making & maintaining extensions ..."

Probably not a good idea for most (aside from Google who have the resources). Most projects concentrate on the core api, documentation and leave the the add-ons for users. I'm specifically thinking of Firefox, JQuery etc.


Google has been bankrolling mozilla for the past couple years now. It's probably in mozilla's interest anyway since extensions provide some good lock-in.


shuts up

=]


This has to be the one of the most idealistic specs I've ever read:

http://dev.chromium.org/developers/design-documents/extensio...


It actually sounds do-able considering how Chrome is built and how Google has built other things using HTML and JavaScript.


If they could bring it to Mac at the same time that would be fantastic.


Agreed. They mentioned that they were working on it on their blog when Chrome was released (bringing chrome to Mac and Linux), so I'm hoping it's still a priority.

http://googlemac.blogspot.com/2008/09/platforms-and-prioriti...



Ditto.


I wonder if the security features are going to prevent extensions from talking to each other. I'd love it if my GMail tab could run an extension which provided services to an extension in my HN tab...


"Of all the Firefox plug-ins, this is the one essential one," said Firefox user Ole Eichhorn. "Chrome is faster until you factor in all the cruft that gets downloaded as ads, then it isn't faster anymore. When Chrome supports AdBlock, it will be the winner, but until it does, Firefox is the only choice."

http://safariadblock.sourceforge.net/


Safari AdBlock doesn't work nearly as well. It's less intuitive - very sadly, considering Safari itself is quite intuitive.

Also, Safari's got some stability issues. Maybe it's just Safari 4, but I've been having some irritating crashes recently.


The patch set for extensions is out for review here: http://codereview.chromium.org/12809/show


You would think that they maybe should have held off releasing chrome until extensions were put into chrome possibly?


I think it's better to release early and iterate. Extensions aren't a launch-critical feature.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: