If you want to be acknowledged as a scholar, then act like one instead of making suspicious statements about your opponents' demographics. It has been discussed ad nauseam at this point that the article provides a history lesson, but the suggestions are illogical or unactionable. It is just not that interesting or relevant.
Where do I make a statement about my (your words) opponents demographics ?
I don’t really see substance in your statements just accusations, vagueness and attempts to shut the dialogue.
Someone wronged wants justice we don’t shut the conversation because it’s boring to you (assuming good intentions). No one is forcing you to participate.
I regret giving your words the benefit of the doubt.
