Ada2012 adopted the concept of design by contract, clamored by some of the biggest Ada users.
At the same time of this update of the language, a large effort was in progress to modernise the 'old' spark that used contacts and proof annotations in Ada code through some kind of comment-based language.
The 'merge' here was to make contracts and proof annotations actually executable Ada code (when it made sense).
SPARK is first a toolsuite that examines Ada code to prove properties on this code (variable initialisation, dataflow properties, absence of runtime retors, partial or complete functional specification). The proverbe tech being only so capable, they had to restrict the supporterd language features (calling it the 'SPARK subset') for a while (most of the restrictions have been lifted in the recent year such as dynamic allocation, exceptions, aliasing) and some very hard things improved too (e.g. floating point handling).
Also, to be complete, since executable contracts are not always enough, they introduced in the Ada language (for SPARK) what they call ghost code (seen and used only by the proof tools).
So, yes, in a way SPARK features were merged in Ada, but you won't be able to use them for proof without the proof tools, you'll have a very expressive form of runtime assertion. Some features actually cascaded back to the compiler and the actual Ada language implementations.
Also, to be easier to use for proof, the Ada2012 and 2022 language specs added a lot of sugar: quantifiers, if-expressions, case-expressions, raise-expressions, but also delta-aggregates... all greatly improving the expressivity of Ada.