already they "make no sense" as natural numbers. (And they aren't.) We can define p-adic addition more formally, and "following the usual rule for adding numbers" (giving c = ···000000000000000001) is just serving as useful motivation in the meantime (that's why the author says "it seems"). You can look up the formal addition rule for p-adic integers, but meanwhile if you accept that the sum c=a+b is also going to be a p-adic integer, then you can think about: if c is not ···000000000000000001, what else could it be? (If you pick a certain position, say the 100 trillionth digit from the right, what is that digit of c going to be? Same for any other position other than the rightmost one.)
(Another analogy: If you consider that 1.0000 - 0.3333 = 0.6667, and 1.00000 - 0.33333 = 0.66667, etc, when you say 1.00000… - 0.33333… = 0.66666…, do you wonder about “where did the 7” go? Footnote 5 in the post discusses this.)
(Another analogy: If you consider that 1.0000 - 0.3333 = 0.6667, and 1.00000 - 0.33333 = 0.66667, etc, when you say 1.00000… - 0.33333… = 0.66666…, do you wonder about “where did the 7” go? Footnote 5 in the post discusses this.)