> [...] we grant you a [...] license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.
> We may suspend, terminate or vary the terms of this license and any access to the code at any time, without notice, for any reason or no reason, in respect of any licensee, group of licensees or all licensees including as may be applicable any sub-licensees.
A more appropriate solution to the problem of cloned FLOSS apps is establishing a trademark.
I mean he says it right before the proprietary apologism, the problem is pointing people in the direction of the project by name only for them to find malware ridden clones. Well. The problem here isn't the software being cloned, the problem is the same name being used by the attackers.
> [...] we grant you a [...] license to access and use the code solely for the purposes of review, compilation and non-commercial distribution.
> We may suspend, terminate or vary the terms of this license and any access to the code at any time, without notice, for any reason or no reason, in respect of any licensee, group of licensees or all licensees including as may be applicable any sub-licensees.
Bummer.