more-open publishing does not necessarily do away with peer review.
the really interesting part is that sometimes review benefits from anonymity and even blinding. doing that in a more-public publishing process would be interesting. (but not impossible - there are tricks to providing authentic anonymous identities.)
the really interesting part is that sometimes review benefits from anonymity and even blinding. doing that in a more-public publishing process would be interesting. (but not impossible - there are tricks to providing authentic anonymous identities.)