Okay, but where is its correction? If you, as a professional publication that considers itself to publish news, unintentionally spread misinformation, you shouldn't just take down the old links, you should put out a new piece with the correct information (and give it just as much attention, don't hide it away).
The news came out, everybody got mad, and not half the people who read the original article (or headline) will revisit the articles and see the retraction.
Maybe the correction will come later, but I'll stay sceptical of anything Wired has to say until the correction comes out.
Okay, but where is its correction? If you, as a professional publication that considers itself to publish news, unintentionally spread misinformation, you shouldn't just take down the old links, you should put out a new piece with the correct information (and give it just as much attention, don't hide it away).
The news came out, everybody got mad, and not half the people who read the original article (or headline) will revisit the articles and see the retraction.
Maybe the correction will come later, but I'll stay sceptical of anything Wired has to say until the correction comes out.